Case Study I
"I will sever all ties with you and not attend your funeral if you go against my wishes"- son of Ms Lam
Ms Lam
Widow, In her 80s
Owner of a $4 million flat
Relation: Son- 40s, Businessman
-
The son asked Ms Lam to sign a document- supposedly to rent out her house to use the rental income to help him manage with his business financial loss.
-
As it turned out, the signed document was for the sale of Ms Lam’s house. The son later promised to buy her a small flat which did not happen.
-
Ms Lam found herself living with his family of five in his two-room flat.
-
Ms Lam was also mistreated by her daughter-in-law, but she chose to put up with it as her son threatened to cut off ties with her
(Tan, 2016b)
Key Learning Points:
-
Law could not protect Ms Lam as there was no forgery of document, verbal promise of buying her a flat was not a concrete evidence --> Importance of introducing law into Women's Charter
-
Ms Lam did not speak out, afraid of abandonment --> Importance of public education & social services
Case Study II
Jane
(not her real name)
Widow, In her 80s
Bedridden, under PA scheme
Relation: Son- 50s, Jobless
"He brought my mum to the streets to beg for money and prevented us from visiting her, by threatening to kill himself "
-Jane's other children
-
Receives $450 a month from the Government's Public Assistance (PA) scheme for the destitute.
-
She is immobilized and must stay in bed.
-
She lives with her son, in his 50s, the youngest of her six children, who is jobless.
-
Her son used his mother's PA money for his own interest while leaving Jane malnourished. Jane also suffered from other problems.
-
At last, her siblings reached out to a social worker and admitted Jane into a nursing home.
(Tan, 2016b)
Key Learning Points:
-
Case of withholding financial assets of elderly mother which deprives her from meeting needs of daily living
-
Social workers managed to come in to intervene --> Importance of social services and professionals and law in intervention & protection.
Financial abuse can occur to anyone regardless of income level. Similarly, in both cases, the elderly mother was left vulnerable to the threats of their son.
So,
how can the law protect them?